Showing posts with label Morgan County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morgan County. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Unemployment Insurance Claims Data Shed Light on the Local Economic Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic


Unemployment Insurance Claims Data Shed Light on the Local Economic Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic

By Lecia Parks Langston, Senior Economist; Michael Jeanfreau, Regional Economist


“You have power over your mind — not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.” Marcus Aurelius

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses lost revenues and workers lost jobs. But because of the time it takes to collect and collate data, economists have been left without much information to quantify the economic impacts at the local level.

But there is one ray of data illumination. Claims for unemployment benefits are promptly available and provide information about a large cross section of the economy. This post will outline what light unemployment claims data sheds on the state of Utah’s Wasatch Front North economy.

While not all workers are protected by unemployment insurance laws, roughly 95% of jobs are covered. This makes claims data an exceptional source of information about the economy. Not included under unemployment insurance laws are most self-employed workers, about half of agricultural employment, unpaid family workers, railroad personnel (covered separately) and many nonprofit organizations (such as churches). Also, some out-of-work employees may not have worked a sufficient work history to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits, but may file anyway. Fortunately, in this time of economic distress, the social safety nets of the unemployment insurance program, special national COVID-19 funding and social programs are working together to keep workers’ income and well-being stable.

Unemployment claimants and the unemployed; they aren’t the same

Also, keep in mind that, in addition to individuals drawing unemployment benefits, the unemployment rate includes those entering and re-entering the workforce and noncovered groups without current employment. This means the number of “unemployed” will be greater than the number of claimants. In “normal” times, only about 40% of the “unemployed” are claiming benefits. The generally reported unemployment rate also has a work-search requirement. If you haven’t made any minimal attempts to find work, you aren’t counted as “unemployed.”

Watch this Space

While this analysis won’t be updated on a regular basis, new data will be added to the data visualization on a weekly basis allowing readers to check back for the latest information.

An Unprecedented Event

Not surprisingly, first-time claims for unemployment benefits have soared in Utah and across the nation as the pandemic swept across the country. This increase is unprecedented since the creation of unemployment insurance coverage during the Great Depression. Week 12 (beginning March 16) marks the start of this unparalleled surge in claims. On a positive note, while new claims for unemployment benefits have skyrocketed in Utah, the state currently shows one of the lowest claims rates in the nation.

For most Wasatch Front North counties, initial claims peaked in week 14 (starting March 30) and have since tapered downward. During the peak, initial claims filed totaled 5,744 in the region. By week 19, claims measured considerably lower but continued to run substantially greater than in previous years — even during the “Great Recession.”

Here’s another example of the tremendous flood of new claims. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, counties in Wasatch Front North Utah averaged a total of 240 first-time claims per week. This time period included seasonally high claims weeks in January. In the weeks after, an average of 3,342 claims were filed for a staggering increase of 1,392%.

Who took the hardest hit?

Each county in the Wasatch Front North region has had a different industry leading the total number of claims in the area. Overall, manufacturing lead total initial claims at 13%, followed by both health care/social assistance and retail trade at 12%, with food service/accommodation following at 11%. Additionally, claims from unknown industries are also prevalent, representing 12% of total initial claims. These claims will mostly fall into the food service industry.

The Domino Effect of COVID-19

In the early stages of the pandemic, this was a story of service-dependent industries. However, the domino effect of the COVID-19 pandemic have also begun to have large impacts in other industries. Claims have been distributed fairly evenly among different industries, with manufacturing, health care/social assistance, retail trade, accommodation/foodservice and claims from “unknown” industries as the top five industries impacted within each county in the Wasatch Front North region. Many of these unclassified claims would rightfully be counted among accommodations/food services if the appropriate information were available.

The initial impact of the pandemic led to the closure of face-to-face jobs, but the change in employment and social behavior both locally and abroad has led to subsequent closures in other industries. Industries that didn’t face instructions to alter behavior during this event still had to adapt to the difference in consumer behavior, supply chains and additional safety precautions.

The Industry Flow

Initial claims in the region have come in waves, with food service/accommodation and unknown claims peaking in week 12, followed by an uptick in claims from nonessential health care services and retail trade through weeks 13 and 14, and lastly a marked increase in manufacturing by week 15.

The High and the Low

Although the largest numbers of claims in Wasatch Front North have come from manufacturing, health care/social assistance, retail trade and food services, in percentage terms, other industries have actually suffered more. For example, in the smaller industries of mining, real estate/rental and leasing, information and personal care services have all seen similar losses of between 16-19% of total covered employment.

Because of its job-to-job nature, the construction industry typically accounts for 15-25% of first-time claims. However, although construction’s new claims have also increased, they have increased at a much slower-than-average rate. After the COVID-19 pandemic hit, construction contributed less than 4% of all first-time claims. Ease of social-distancing and good weather have helped construction maintain employment levels. New claims measured just 5% of covered construction employment.

Only a portion of agricultural employment is covered by unemployment insurance laws. However, as companies work to keep America fed, agribusiness has laid off few employees. Only 2% of Wasatch Front North’s covered agricultural workers have filed a claim during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Public administration, educational services (including public and higher education), finance/insurance and utilities have also managed to keep a higher percentage of their workforces employed.


County by County

Davis County
  • Davis County matched the state average for new claims as a share of covered employment (10%). While the whole region suffered similar initial losses, Davis County was largely spared the increase in manufacturing claims that Weber County experienced in the weeks following the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • While the percent of covered employment is lower in Davis County, it had the largest total initial claims in the region (13,951), narrowly beating out Weber County (12,451).
  • Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Davis County averaged 104 first-time claims per week compared with 1,744 claims after the pandemic. This increase of 1,581% ranked as the largest in the region.
  • Retail trade, health care/social services and accommodation/food services generated the highest number of initial claims during the pandemic.
  • Davis County’s initial claims peaked on week 14, totaling 3,081. This was the only week that claims rose over 3,000.
  • The regional share of new claims that Davis County had rose from before 43% of claims to 52% during the pandemic.

Morgan County
  • Prior to the COVID-19 slowdown, Morgan County averaged three unemployment insurance claims per week compared to 42 new claims afterward, an increase of 1,071%.
  • Because of its relatively large share of service industry employment, Morgan County has shown a higher-than-average increase in claims due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • New claims as a percent of covered employment measured at 13% — above the state average of 10%.
  • Morgan was slightly unusual compared to other areas, with health care/social assistance receiving more initial claims than food service/accommodation industry.
  • In counties with small workforces, the lack of data accuracy can make an impact to volatility. In Morgan County, the initial claims data show claims from an overwhelming percentage of covered employment in both entertainment and management of companies.
  • Morgan County remained a meager 1% of total first-time claims for the region during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Weber County
  • While Weber County and Davis County are the two large contributors to employment numbers in the region, Weber County has had 12,451 total first-time claims filed during the COVID-19 pandemic. While this is only slightly less than Davis County (13,951), Weber County’s share of first-time claims within the entire region dropped before and during the COVID-19 slowdown from 55% of all claims before to 47% of all claims during. This means that, while Weber County’s claims increased proportionately less than other counties in the region.
  • Before the slowdown, an average of 133 initial claims were being filed in Weber County compared to an average of 994 claims in the following weeks. The pre-to-post-pandemic increase registered at 1,339%
  •  Initial claims for unemployment insurance filed during the pandemic as a percent of covered employment measured at 11%, near the middle of a ranking of all Utah counties.
  • Weber County had more first-time claims filed during the pandemic from the manufacturing (2,376) and health care/social assistance (1,470) industries than the more common accommodation/food services.
  • While the total claims are higher in other industries, several industries suffered larger portions of claims as a percent of covered employment. Real estate/rental and leasing saw claims from 19% of covered employment, while industries designated as “other services” received the same. In this case, these claims will largely be coming from personal beauty services, a subset of “other services.” Information (18%), mining (16%) and accommodation/food service (16%) all similarly saw claims from a high percent of covered employment.
  • Claims originating from manufacturing and transportation surged towards the latter weeks of the pandemic time period.


Monday, March 5, 2018

Utah's Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rates

Seasonally adjusted unemployment rates for all Utah counties have been posted online here.

Each month, these rates are posted the Monday following the Unemployment Rate Update for Utah.

For more information about seasonally adjusted rates, read a DWS analysis here.

Next update scheduled for March 26th.

Friday, March 2, 2018

Utah's Employment Situation for January 2018

Utah's Employment Situation for January 2018 has been released on the web.

Find the Current Economic Situation in its entirety here.

For charts and tables, including County Employment, go to the Employment and Unemployment page.

Next update scheduled for March 23rd, 2018.


Wednesday, January 27, 2016

How educated is the Wasatch Front North’s workforce?
It depends on how you look at it — based on where they work or where they live.

Matt Schroeder, Regional Economist

Local leaders have become increasingly aware of the relationship between the education level of their local workforce and the economic strength of their communities. Higher levels of education are closely linked to higher incomes for individuals; which, in turn, brings in higher tax revenues and lower government social program costs. People with higher education levels tend to be healthier, more involved in community organizations and give more to charity. They are also less likely to be chronically unemployed, less likely to require social assistance, and have lower incarceration rates.

More broadly, when businesses look to expand or locate in a particular area, one of the primary factors they consider is the availability and training of the local workforce. A region with a more highly educated labor pool will tend to draw businesses that need highly educated employees. Those jobs, in turn, tend to garner higher wages. Higher wages mean more consumer spending and tax revenue for local governments, which allow for investment in infrastructure, public services and community development.

These benefits have long been known and I mention them to highlight why so much emphasis is often placed on education in the public arena. It really matters for community health and development. But there is an interesting question to this issue that is seldom explored when we think about how to better educate our local workforce: Should we be focusing on the education levels of the people who live in our communities, or on those who work in our communities?

To clarify, we’re talking about community investment in increasing higher education attainment levels, not the funding of primary and secondary education. On the resident workforce side, this may include expanding post-secondary degree programs and institutions, or encouraging and supporting student enrollment in higher education. On the working workforce side, higher levels of educational attainment are achieved by growing the number of jobs that require higher levels of education. Community investments to achieve this may include developing infrastructure and facilities to meet the needs of businesses, incentives for target industries.

For a local city or county considering investing in these types of development projects with limited funds, where should their focus be? This is an especially relevant question in an area like the Wasatch Front North where the local commuting patterns are very fluid. Thousands of commuters flow (mostly south) along I-15 every day to jobs in other cities and counties. A well-educated economist, for example, may be living in Ogden, but commutes down to Salt Lake City every day for work. Should local leaders be concerned with developing a better-educated resident workforce if they are likely to commute somewhere else for work? Or should the community be more focused on bringing in the kinds of jobs that will help keep an already well-educated population working closer to home?

The answers to these questions depend on the specific characteristics of local economies, and unfortunately, no single answer or formula can be applied across the board. As a start, it helps to first have a picture of what’s actually happening. The interactive data visualization above allows you to see the situation for your county. Click on the map to see your county and hover over each chart to see details and an interpretation of the data.

In Davis, Morgan and Weber counties more people commute out for work than come in. Of the three, Davis County has the largest net outflow, with more than 26,000 net out-commuters representing about 30 percent of the resident workforce. Of those 26,000, more than 40 percent, or some 11,000 net out-commuters, have a bachelor’s degree or higher. The share of workers with a bachelor’s degree living in Davis County is 34 percent while the share working there is just 31 percent.

Morgan County sees the largest percentage of its resident workforce commute outside the county for work. The net out-flow of 1,800 workers represents more than 60 percent of the resident workforce and about 650 of those have a bachelor’s degree or higher. The share of workers with a bachelor’s degree or more living in Morgan County is 33 percent — 6 percentage-points higher than the 27 percent with the same level of education actually working in the county.

Weber County has the lowest rate of worker out-flow of the three counties. More people commute out for work than come in, but the net outflow of about 1,600 represents only 2.5 percent of the resident workforce, and about half of those are workers with a bachelor’s or higher.

Each of these counties is distinct in terms of the factors that play into why their worker flow patterns exist. For Davis and Morgan counties there is clearly a current resident population more educated than the local job market demands. It may be worth exploring the possibility that those areas may benefit from a greater focus on high-skilled job creation. Weber County, on the other hand, is currently balanced in terms of the share of highly educated workers that live and work there, but with a relatively low share in both, Weber may benefit most from a two-pronged approach that seeks to bring in higher skilled jobs while at the same time building the workforce to fill them.

Monday, August 3, 2015

Morgan County Economic Update

Morgan County Continues Expansion in Early 2015

By Matt Schroeder

Morgan County continued robust economic expansion in early 2015. Employment grew at a faster rate than any other county in northern Utah.  Taxable sales were up 15 percent. Unemployment remains among the lowest in the state and initial unemployment insurance claims are back to pre-recession levels. Wage growth, although not great, is outpacing the rest of the state. Overall, the indicators are reaffirming that the long term trajectory of economic performance for the county is positive.

Local Insights updated on the web

By Mark Knold, Supervising Economist 

Shelter is one of humanity’s basic needs. That is why housing is everywhere. Since housing is so ubiquitous, it becomes an important component in an economy’s foundation, and as such becomes an economic indicator.

In this issue of Local Insights, we look at the demand for housing structures, the amount of housing permits and their history, and how this history shows that housing demand follows the ups and downs of a region’s economic performance. In evaluating the volume of housing permits, we also parallel the health and vitality of the local economy.

People need jobs that supply them income in order to afford housing. Jobs are not the only factor, as things like affordability and the ability to obtain lending also play their part in housing demand. But the foundation of housing demand is the health of the job market.


The graph shows Utah statewide housing permits. A trend of normal permitting activity is evident from 1996 through 2004. Permits rose during the pre-Great Recession boom, then became lethargic for the seven years following. It is just recently that the volume of permit activity is again approaching something normal. That in itself is an economic indicator of an improved Utah economy.


--------------------------------------------

To read more, see the latest issues of Local Insights. To receive a printed copy, please call 801-526-9785.